Immoral Greed †War and Morality

I am pen to you today be convey I want to emit to you my fancys on lessonity and contend. Morality is an lofty that tail end be defined as doing what is right, from a philosophical perspective, regardless of the emf consequences of taking action. Although morality is simple to define, what is moral to iodine person may be immoral to anformer(a), making morality on the whole subjective when it comes to real problems. Political, social, and religious influences be just a few inputs that nonify affect whether a person sees a particular situation as every moral or immoral. Morality is besides relative, and squirt change found on the situation.One of the most contr everywheresial egresss, as morality is concerned, is that of fight. While state of fightf ar is a necessary evil, political influences and the need for forcefulness serve contend a potential immoral action when it is non through with(p) for the betterment of a people or society. The motives of a n ation that goes to state of fight ar one of the most controversial when it comes to the issues of morality. A nation can become obscure in a violent fundamental interaction for many reasons, and the morality of the war can be based on these reasons. several(prenominal) wars be fueled by index finger hungry politicians, while others ar waged on religious or societal beliefs and impressions. The issue of morality and war is covered in prize Carters, Just warfare or a Just fight? and Martin Luther mogul, jr.s, Letter from Birmingham discard.First, I take that in graze for a war to be a moral war, only non-violent options moldiness be exercised. In Jimmy Carters op-ed piece, entitled Just warfare or a Just war?, Mr. Carter makes the observation that war can be waged only as a conk out resort (Carter 260). Before a war is waged, a nations leaders should exhaust any diplomatic fashion of resolving the differences they sop up with their foes. In almost governments, h unger for power, rather than acting on a threat, causes war to be waged at the drop of a hat. In the ongoing war in Iraq, there is a great deal controversy over whether the united States state war on Iraq because it was a give-up the ghost resort, or because the U.S. was hungry for power, and wanted to practice its influence over the Iraki people.This component of war is further corroborated in Martin Luther poove, juniors , Letter from Birmingham Jail. At the height of racial tension in the southeastern, nance writes, the citys gaberdine power structure left the lightlessness community with no alternative (King, younger 164). This reflects that not only can war be waged between nations, it can also be waged in a antithetical sense, among a nation.Mr. King also outlines iv tones in resolving conflicts in a non-violent manner, collection of the facts to determine whether injustices personify negotiation self-purification and direct action (King, jr. 164). It is important to note that the final step in this outline is direct action. In the same centering that problems between nations essentialiness be resolved, tensions among a nation must also be resolved, and these attempts at a resolution must be make in a diplomatic way if possible before war is waged.Secondly, I believe that a moral war must consist of actions that are same to those actions taken against the nation. Although the consequences of war, such as remnant and end, are inevitable, Carter also notes that, Its violence must be proportional to the injury we put on suffered (Carter 260). To lash out at a weaker nation simply because of differing moodls is not an satisfactory cause for war. However, to react to a threat or aggressive acts, is an acceptable cause to wage a war.Many times, governments are hungry for power and will go to war for any reason, simply to utilise their power and influence over other countries, thus extending their influence across the nations. For example, the war that the United States has waged against Iraq is a questionable one when it comes to this element. Carter notes that the efforts to tie Iraq to the 9/11 terrorist attacks wealthy person been unconvincing (Carter 260).Although Saddam Husseins rule over his people may shake been cruel and murderous, the United States did not have the evidence they should have had linking Iraq to the checkmate Towers incident in order to unloosen declaring war. In this sense, the current war may not be moral, as the United States acted out of proportion to any actions Iraq took against us.The idea of any retaliation against or among a nation being based only on injuries suffered, is furthered in Mr. Kings observations. In Martin Luther King, Jr.s, Letter from Birmingham Jail, he notes that we have not do a single gain in civil rights without determined legal and nonviolent pressure (King, Jr. 166). Because the injuries suffered by the African American public in the South were no t of a physical nature, save rather a political nature, Mr. King reiterates that with consistent pressure from the African American community in a non-violent manner, they have been able to make progress in obtaining civil rights.It is important to note Mr. Kings emphasis on the need of determination in bringing active any amount of change to the African American community. To resolve the conflict in the South between races, it took many historic period of protesting and non-violent measures, and if the African American population had not been determined to bringing about a non-violent end to their struggle, the changes that took place may have never occurred.Finally, I believe that a war can only be considered to be moral if the outcome of the war is a significant improvement over the nation that existed prior to the conflict. Carter notes that in order for a war to be just, The tranquility it establishes must be a come about improvement over what exists (Carter 260). In esse nce, the wash of the war must create a sense of peace that is much alter over what had antecedently existed within the nation if it does not, the war was ultimately in vain.These elements are apparent in the current war that the United States is waging in Iraq. The United States has foregone to war with Iraq, perhaps with the best of intentions for the Iraqi people, but only chaos and destruction have ensued. The peace of the nation of Iraq has not been much improved over what was previously in place. Martin Luther King, Jr. touches on the idea of acceptable moral reasons for demanding changes, as wellhead.Mr. King writes, Thus it is that I can persuade men to obey the 1954 decision of the authoritative Court, for it is morally right and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances, for they are morally wrong (King, Jr. 168). In both Carter and Kings writing, it is well noted that peace is the ultimate terminal of any conflict, whether it be between nations or among one nation.In conclusion, morality is a subjective ideal that is a ratifier to conflicts both between nations and among one nation. struggle is necessary, but can be based on political, religious, or societal pressures of a nation. War can be perpetuated by political greed, or religious and societal reasons. It is important for a nation to make a valiant attempt to diplomati echoy resolve their conflicts with other nations or among their take nation before waging war. The morality of waging war is one of the most controversial issues nations face, whether it be with other nations or in traffic with conflicts among their own nation.Works CitedCarter, Jimmy. Just War or a Just War? The Presence of Others voices and images that call for response. Andrea Lunsford and John Ruszkiewicz. capital of Massachusetts Bedford, 2004. 259-261. King, Jr., Martin L. Letter From Birmingham Jail. The Presence of Others voices and images that call for response. Andrea Lunsford and John Ruszkiewicz. Bo ston Bedford, 2004. 163-176.